• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

www.myfederalretirement.com

Financial Planning Resources for Federal & Postal Employees

  • FREE Newsletter
  • Pay & COLAs
  • Thrift Savings
  • Insurance
  • FERS / CSRS
  • Find A Professional
  • Workshops
  • Podcast
Advertisement

16 Things Seniors Born Between 1941-1969 Could Take Advantage Of

There are a number of lesser-known programs that can help slash bills, reduce insurance costs, and unlock powerful financial perks — right now.
We pulled together some of the most valuable money moves for 2026. Cut expenses, boost your retirement, and recession-proof your finances.

Check them out here


AFGE Expands Lawsuit for COVID-19 Hazard Pay

July 28, 2020 My Federal Retirement

The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) added plaintiffs from several new agencies in their lawsuit against the federal government on behalf of AFGE members and federal employees who were exposed to the coronavirus while performing their official duties.

The initial lawsuit supported claims of workers who were seeking pay increases of 25% as compensation for the dangers of being exposed to COVID-19 while on duty.

In addition to the original named plaintiffs in the lawsuit from the Bureau of Prisons, Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, the amended complaint added plaintiffs from the Department of Labor, Social Security Administration, Federal Grain Inspection Service, multiple Department of Defense components (including the Air Force, Army, and Defense Commissary Agency), and multiple Department of Homeland Security components (including Citizenship and Immigration Services, Transportation Security Administration, Customs and Border Protection, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement).

According to AFGE, the complaint alleges that the General Schedule (GS) plaintiffs are entitled to a 25% hazard pay differential under Title 5, because they were exposed to “hazardous working conditions through the performance of their assigned duties and that the hazardous duty had not been taken into account in the classification of their positions.” A “virulent biological” like the coronavirus would clearly qualify as a hazard under Title 5. Similarly, Wage Grade (WG) plaintiffs are entitled to an 8% environmental pay increase for exposure to micro-organisms.

“Each day front-line federal employees willingly risk their health and their families’ health to provide critical services to the American people. Since our original complaint was filed in March, tens of thousands of federal employees have contracted COVID-19 and many more are suffering because they are being forced to go to work in unsafe environments. It is our hope that the government does right by these employees and pays them the hazardous duty pay they’ve earned,” said AFGE National President Everett Kelley. “I also implore Congress to finally pass legislation to provide hazardous duty pay to all front-line federal employees not already covered by existing laws like our nurses in federal prisons and health care workers at the VA who provide direct patient care to our nation’s veterans.”

AFGE states since the original complaint was filed, hundreds of federal employees have died and tens of thousands more have been sickened by COVID-19.

Advertisement

“Federal employees are risking their lives and the lives of their families every day when they leave their homes. It has been four months since we filed this lawsuit and the federal government isn’t doing a better job of protecting its work force. Rather, large numbers of federal employees have gotten sick and died, including at the Bureau of Prisons. Whether it’s failing to take commonsense precautions and to provide PPE or not allowing people to telework – the federal workforce is suffering,” said Heidi Burakiewicz, partner at Kalijarvi, Chuzi, Newman & Fitch (KCNF DC), the law firm representing AFGE. “All of these men and women, and many others working in jobs across the federal government, have met the legal standards outlined in Title 5, and the government needs to give them their hazard pay differential.”

Related:

  • Some Federal Employees Can Sign Up for COVID-19 Hazard Pay Lawsuit
  • Medicare Expands Telehealth Benefits for Beneficiaries During COVID-19 Outbreak

Primary Sidebar

Recent Must-Reads

Understanding the FERS Retirement Annuity Supplement

Why 62 Is the Magic Age for FERS Employees to Retire

Footer

About Us
Contact Us
Advertise

Free Email Newsletter
Facebook
Twitter

Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Cookies Policy

My Federal Retirement is not affiliated with the U.S. Federal Government.
Copyright © 2007-2024 My Federal Retirement. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction without permission prohibited.