| Home |
Articles | Federal Retiree Testifies on How Long-Term Seasonal Employment Negatively Affected Her Retirement Be . . .
|
Federal Retiree Testifies on How Long-Term Seasonal Employment Negatively Affected Her Retirement Benefits
July 6, 2010
Patricia Barts, a member of the National Active and Retired Federal Employees
Association (NARFE) from Atco, NJ, testified last week that her employer, the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS), took 16 years to upgrade her from a seasonal to
permanent worker, which significantly lowered the annuity she receives in
retirement.
Barts' testimony was part of a hearing held by the House Subcommittee on the
Federal Workforce, regarding federal agency use of temporary and seasonal hiring
authority.
"I enjoyed working for the agency and always felt respected by my superiors.
Still, as a matter of equity, I believe I have been unfairly denied benefits
which I should have been able to access," Barts said.
Barts begin her career with the IRS in 1970 as a seasonal employee.
However, despite an exemplary work history, salary increases and a promotion,
she remained in seasonal status.
"During my fourteen seasonal years as a data transcriber, I worked every day
except one, being furloughed on a Thursday and brought back on Monday. This was
done to break my time. If I had worked the extra day, I would have been made a
permanent employee -- and entitled to all of the rights and benefits that would
accrue to the status," she
said.
In 1984 she applied for and was accepted as a tax examiner so that she could
be paid a higher salary and finally receive permanent status. But it took
another year and half before the IRS made Barts a permanent employee. In
1987, when the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) was introduced, Barts
and other participants in the older Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) were
counseled to remain in CSRS. "This turned out to be bad advice," she
testified. "At that time the seasonal employees in FERS were
credited with a full year's service time if they worked at least four months out
of the
year."
Barts and other CSRS employees asked IRS management if they could receive
the same credit for their years of service as FERS workers, but they were turned
down. "It is my feeling that we should have been credited with our service
the same as FERS employees. If this had been the policy, I would have 31
years and 7 months of service instead of 26 years and 7 months. This policy
greatly affected my retirement annuity and that of other fellow CSRS workers,"
Barts
said.
Following the hearing, NARFE President Margaret L. Baptiste said, "Federal
agencies rightly have the discretion to hire temporary and seasonal employees
for a specific project with an ending date, or to expedite the process of
employing individuals without any previous federal civil service status.
However, we are concerned about what happens to the retirement security of
seasonal workers like Ms. Barts who remain in temporary status for 16 years
despite her admirable on-the-job performance."
The National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) also warned Congress in the
hearing against federal agency misuse of temporary employee status.
"While temporary employment status can be useful to an agency when properly
applied, it is also a status that lends itself to abuse and can be an unfair
working condition for an employee," NTEU President Colleen M. Kelley said.
Employees classified as temporary do not participate in the Federal Employees
Retirement System (FERS) and lack the right to family and medical leave, as well
as leave for military service. Although regulations are clear that agencies are
prohibited from using temporary status to avoid the costs of employee benefits,
to extend the probationary period or to avoid competitive hiring, NTEU is
concerned that these regulations are often ignored.
As an example, Kelley highlighted a situation at the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which hired thousands of temporary employees
during the 1980s to manage and liquidate the assets of failed banks and savings
and loans.
"They served in continuous one-year appointments with thousands of them
serving longer than five years and many renewed yearly for over fifteen years,"
Kelley said. "These employees were clearly temporary only in name."
According to NTEU, with the passage legislation creating FERS, federal
employees without retirement credit because they had years in temporary status
were able to buy back credit for the years prior to 1989 by paying for the
retirement deductions that were not taken. But the former temporary FDIC
employees were not allowed to buy back credit for temporary service after 1989.
The result is that valuable service time from January 1, 1989, until the date
that they actually became eligible to participate in FERS and have deductions
made was essentially lost or forfeited.
"With 180,000 temporary employees, representing 10% of our federal civilian
workforce, it is our duty as citizens to rectify a situation where many of these
employees are being treated as second class workers," said the subcommittee's
chairman Stephen F. Lynch (D - MA). "Although reforms have been made, we must
sharpen our regulations and oversight to lessen any abuses that may be
occurring. If the federal government is to truly shine as a model employer, we
must treat all of our employees with the utmost fairness and respect."
|