CSRS / FERS Federal Retirement Planning Tools and Resources: Thrift Savings - TSP, FEGLI, FEHB and more.
Home     Articles     News     Resources     Find A Professional     Retirement Seminars     FREE NEWSLETTER    
 Financial Professionals Directory

Find a financial professional in your area. Click here

 Retirement Seminars

Federal retirement seminars for agencies.
Learn more

 Top 5 Resources

1. TSP Roth option
2. GS pay scale 2015
3. Best dates to retire
4. Latest TSP returns
5. Discount dental plans

 CSRS Retirement
 Overview - CSRS
 Eligibility - CSRS
 Creditable Service -CSRS
 Survivor Benefits - CSRS
 Annuity Calculation-CSRS
 FERS Retirement
 Overview - FERS
 Eligibility - FERS
 Creditable Service -FERS
 Survivor Benefits - FERS
 Thrift Savings Plan
 Thrift Savings -Overview
 TSP Investment Choices
 TSP Loan Program
 TSP Contributions
 TSP Roth Option
 TSP Withdrawals
 TSP Returns
 TSP.gov Account Access
 TSP Forms Library
 TSP Talk Online Forum
 FEGLI - Life Insurance
 FEHB - Health Benefits
 FEDVIP - Dental/Vision
 FLTCIP - Long-Term Care
 FSAFEDS - Flex Spending
 Financial Planning
 Tax Tips
 Find A Professional
 Retirement Seminars
 Retirement Benefits Tax
 Retirement Living
 Relocation / Real Estate
 Retirement Jobs
Home | Articles | 16 Employee Groups Urge Congress to Reject 40% Tax on Cadillac Health Plans

16 Employee Groups Urge Congress to Reject 40% Tax on "Cadillac" Health Plans
January 13, 2010
Printer-Friendly Format

Sixteen federal unions and employee groups urged leaders in Congress yesterday to drop a provision in the Senate's version of the health care reform bill that would impose a 40 percent excise tax on so-called "Cadillac" health insurance plans.

If passed, the tax would start in the year 2013 affecting individual health plans with annual premiums greater than $8,500 and family health plans with annual premiums greater than $23,000.

The employee groups -- which state this tax would affect some federal employees in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan (FEHBP) -- sent a letter to several congressional leaders on January 12 (see text of the letter below).

National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) President Colleen Kelley noted separately to the letter, "even though the tax would not become effective until 2013, and its financial thresholds would increase every year, those increases very likely would not be enough to offset medical inflation."

"The result," Kelley added, "would have FEHBP enrollees facing benefit cuts, and higher premiums and co-payments as insurance companies simply pass along this increased cost."

January 11, 2010


Our organizations represent the nearly 9 million federal and postal employees and retirees and their families who participate in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP). The FEHBP is the largest employer-sponsored health benefits plan of its kind in the United States. Established by Congress in 1959, it serves as a beacon in recruiting and retaining quality individuals to federal and postal service. The FEHBP has succeeded in providing enrollees with adequate health care coverage at competitive price levels.

As you work to craft a final health care bill, we want you to know that our members support your efforts to contain medical costs, but insist upon the preservation and integrity of FEHBP as a program designed principally for federal and postal employees and annuitants.

Towards this end, we believe the final bill must:

Include the Senate's FEHBP protections. If House and Senate negotiators agree to include a Senate provision to require the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to administer multi-state health plans, we urge you to retain the provisions in Sec. 1334 (g) of the Reid amendment to the Senate passed bill, entitled "Continued Support for FEHBP" . Federal workers and annuitants have often heard that "if you like the health insurance coverage you currently have, you can keep it." FEHBP protections in the Senate-passed bill would uphold that principle and would ensure that the health insurance earned by federal workers and annuitants continues to offer comprehensive coverage with affordable and predictable premiums.

OPM's role in administering a national health plan for non-FEHBP participants is the most significant expansion of its duties in the agency's history. For that reason we ask that you allow us, as representatives of the federal employee and annuitant community, to review and comment on the final agreement between the House and Senate so that we can ensure our members that the integrity and administration of the FEHBP remains intact.

Drop the Excise Tax on "High Value" Health Insurance. According to the Federal Times, 1 a study has recently been completed on the effect of the excise tax on FEHBP. It and other projections demonstrate that the most popular plan, Blue Cross/Blue Shield Standard (BS/BS) plan, would be subjected to the tax. While the excise tax is slated to be imposed on the insurers on so-called high cost plans, the tax will be passed on to enrollees in the form of higher premiums, co-pays or reduced benefits. BC/BS plans cover approximately 48% of FEHBP enrollees, or nearly 3.8 million Americans. Single enrollees would be subject to the effects of the tax in 2013, while families are hit in the third year. Including other, non-BC/BS plans, more than one-half of active and retired enrollees will face the effects of these taxes that accumulate to thousands of dollars in the middle to out years of the Senate-passed bill. Because we understand the value of all health care is counted towards the threshold amounts, enrollees with dental or vision coverage, or a Flexible Spending Account, could reach the thresholds even sooner and feel the effects of this tax earlier.

Characterizing this tax proposal as a "Cadillac tax" is a misnomer. It hits the average blue collar and white collar employee or annuitant. FEHBP insurers will simply reduce coverage and, as the taxes increase, a downward spiral toward less coverage will ensue, which is antithetical to health care reform's stated purpose. Penalizing FEHBP enrollees with this tax is a huge disincentive to qualified applicants seeking federal or postal employment. It is bad for the government and bad policy overall.

Clarify that FEHBP plans must provide dependent coverage for children up to age 27. We are concerned the House and Senate bills are not clear enough on the requirement for group health plans to expand dependent coverage to the FEHBP. To recruit and retain the best and brightest workers, the federal government, like private employers, should be able to offer its employees FEHBP coverage for their dependents up to age 27.

Thank you for taking these concerns into account as you work to merge the House and Senate health care reform legislation. Our members strongly support affordable health care for all Americans and believe that goal can be attained without undermining the health coverage already secured by millions of active and retired federal/postal workers.


American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE)
American Foreign Service Association (AFSA)
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME)
American Postal Workers Union (APWU)
Federal Managers Association (FMA)
Laborers' International Union of North America (LIUNA)
National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association (NARFE)
National Air Traffic Controller Association (NATCA)
National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC)
National Association of Postal Supervisors (NAPS)
National Association of Postmasters of the United States (NAPUS)
National League of Postmasters of the United States
National Postal Mail Handlers Union (NPMHU)
National Rural Letter Carriers' Association (NRLCA)
National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU)
Professional Aviation Safety Specialists (PASS)

Get other resources like this
delivered to your email box -- FREE!
PRIVACY:  We never share email addresses  Unsubscribe anytime.

Featured Columnist
Read federal retirement articles written by federal benefits expert and Certified Financial Planner, Edward Zurndorfer

Recent Articles & Resources
 Thrift Savings Plan Returns: Monthly and Annual - G, F, C, S, I and L Funds Updated: July 2, 2015
 President Signs Bill Eliminating 10% Early Withdrawal Penalty for Retired Federal Law Enforcement Of
 Federal Employee Union Sues OPM Over Data Breach
 5 Questions to Ask Before Transferring IRA and Retirement Funds To and From the Traditional TSP
 Senate Committee Approves Bill to Stop Wasteful Federal Employee Bonuses